How much Bitcoin did users withdraw from Bitget after the $388M hack resumed?

Bitget customers withdrew over 4,000 BTC within a single hour after the exchange resumed withdrawal services following a $388 million hack. This rapid outflow signals a significant breakdown in user trust despite the platform's efforts to restore operations.
How much Bitcoin did users withdraw from Bitget after the $388M hack resumed?

Bitget customers withdrew more than 4,000 Bitcoins (BTC) within the first sixty minutes of the exchange reopening its withdrawal gates this week. The mass exit followed a period of suspended services necessitated by a massive $388 million security breach. The scale of the withdrawal highlights an immediate 'bank run' sentiment as users prioritized the safety of their assets over continued use of the platform.

The initial hack, which resulted in the theft of nearly $400 million, forced Bitget to halt all outgoing transactions to prevent further losses and conduct a forensic audit. While the technical restoration of services was intended to signal a return to normalcy, the immediate departure of such a large volume of Bitcoin suggests that the exchange's reputation has suffered a severe blow. The 4,000 BTC outflow represents hundreds of millions of dollars in capital fleeing the ecosystem in a very short window.

From a regulatory and market perspective, this event serves as a stark reminder of the 'not your keys, not your coins' mantra that continues to dominate the 2026 crypto landscape. US-focused investors and regulators are closely watching how Bitget manages its remaining liquidity, as such sudden, large-scale withdrawals can lead to slippage and potential insolvency risks for smaller trading pairs if the trend continues.

Investors should now watch for updated proof-of-reserves reports from Bitget and any official announcements regarding a victim compensation fund. The exchange's ability to maintain operations and stop the bleeding of assets will be critical for its survival. Additionally, this incident may trigger renewed calls from US lawmakers for stricter security audits and mandatory insurance for centralized exchanges operating within or serving international markets.

Editorial method

This report is based on the linked source and is labeled with its publication date, provider, category and market-impact assessment. Market interpretation is informational, not investment advice.