Why are crypto treasury premiums shrinking despite Kalshi's $40B valuation and Blockchain.com IPO?

In the 2026 crypto market, high-profile exits like Kalshi and Blockchain.com are hitting massive benchmarks while treasury-focused firms struggle to maintain their once-inflated premiums. This shift indicates that institutional investors are now prioritizing operational revenue and infrastructure utility over speculative digital asset holdings on balance sheets.
Why are crypto treasury premiums shrinking despite Kalshi's $40B valuation and Blockchain.com IPO?

The 2026 crypto private market is experiencing a significant shift in valuation dynamics as capital returns to the sector with newfound discipline. While prediction market leader Kalshi is currently seeking a landmark $40 billion valuation and Blockchain.com is finally moving toward a public listing via an IPO, the 'crypto premium' that historically boosted treasury-focused companies is fading. Investors are no longer willing to pay a massive surplus for firms whose primary value is derived from holding Bitcoin or Ethereum, favoring instead those with high-volume transactional utility or prediction-based infrastructure.

Kalshi’s aggressive $40 billion target reflects the surge in event-based trading and the normalization of prediction markets within US financial ecosystems in 2026. Simultaneously, Blockchain.com’s IPO push signals that legacy service providers are looking to exit while liquidity is high. However, the struggle for crypto treasury companies to maintain their valuations shows a maturing market where the novelty of holding crypto is no longer a substitute for traditional cash flow metrics. This decoupling suggests that 'proxy' investments are losing ground to pure-play infrastructure.

From a regulatory standpoint, the stabilization of US crypto oversight in early 2026 has increased competition from traditional fintechs. As major banks now offer competing custody and treasury services, the unique selling point for specialized crypto treasury firms has diminished, leading to a compression in their valuation multiples. This re-rating is forcing the industry to align more closely with traditional software-as-a-service (SaaS) and fintech benchmarks rather than the hyperbolic growth models seen in the early 2020s.

Market participants should closely monitor the Blockchain.com S-1 filing for clues on how the public market will price mature crypto services versus high-growth startups like Kalshi. The success of these two major capital events will determine if the $40 billion valuation for Kalshi is an outlier or a new standard for top-tier infrastructure. If treasury-focused firms continue to lag, expect a wave of consolidation or pivot strategies as these companies seek to add more service-based revenue streams to their portfolios.

Editorial method

This report is based on the linked source and is labeled with its publication date, provider, category and market-impact assessment. Market interpretation is informational, not investment advice.